Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2541 - 2560
of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2010, 2:40 am
This hearing before Judge Fine wasn't a symposium, a tent revival or laboratory. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
Well, you don't give a f*ck. / THE COURT: Mr. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:51 pm
I don't expect the defense to permit that. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:51 am
"Without an attorney, we don't have a voice. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 8:53 am
On appeal, the Ninth Circuit Court affirmed Judge Patel's decision and found the government's regulations preventing publication unconstitutional. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:47 pm
Who doesn't? [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 9:56 am
While we help defend Apple in the courts, we invite you to participate in the defense of your own privacy & security by joining these actions and raising your voice through every channel available. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 7:28 am
You know, that’s a part of the bill which people don’t even talk about. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
It also noted that an appellate court, like the Colorado Court of Appeals, can affirm a trial judge’s ruling on a premise different from the one the trial judge relied on, if evidence in the trial record supports the ruling. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 8:57 am
In short, we don't need criminal statutes at all; as long as, somewhere, there's a prosecutor and a judge who are satisfied that the defendant is a bad guy, just convict him and lock him up. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 1:25 pm
How in the hell is the prosecutor going to know if the case needs to be dismissed if they don't evaluate the case? [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Aren't we reviewing certification only? [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:54 am
To be fair, I don’t believe for a minute that the Director really believes we can literally maximize both Internet security and public safety simultaneously. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:28 am
You don't kill first and test later. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 2:20 am
It's more preliminary than a preliminary injunction.I don't see a convincing arugment here that there is "irreparable" harm to the plaintiffs. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am
So perhaps deception in the trade secret context isn't as uncommon as we might think, even if we may not actually call it "lying. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:10 am
Don't you? [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:36 am
I don't want to say it lest I be sued.Then there's the small matter of 25 million in actual damages. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
Gov't, 305 F.3d 566, (U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:12 am
The job comes without benefits, and when they don't work, they don't get paid. [read post]
