Search for: "BAKER v. THE STATE" Results 2561 - 2580 of 2,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am by Melina Padron
Burnley Training College Ltd, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2928 (Admin) (24 August 2011) November 9, 2011 Admin Court: Refusal of licence for Burnley college under Home Secretary’s policy to prevent abuse by overseas students was unlawful. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 12:04 pm
Baker, Deputy AG Mary Beth Westmoreland and Senior Assistant AG Susan V. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Abu Baker Alam was incorrectly identified as Numan Haider – a terrorist who attacked police – on the front pages of The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Canberra Times. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
., Frankfurter's opinions first in Gobitis and then his angry and anguished dissent in Barnette that helped to establish the split within liberalism between those who believed in "judicial restraint" and those who were beginning to rally around what came to be called "Footnote 4" liberalism instantiated in such decisions as Brown and then, perhaps most strikingly, Baker v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:46 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck has been assisting with research and strategic planning in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
ACSblog highlights a recent American Constitution Society issue brief on state laws that bar people with criminal records from voting, in light of the Court’s recent call for the views of the Solicitor General in Simmons v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 9:05 pm by Christopher R. Yukins
Supreme Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]