Search for: "Box v. State"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 4,730
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2018, 9:38 am
Solution 2: Supervision of elections by the State government, or by the Federal government, or indictments by Federal prosecutors, to restore democracy to the process. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:25 am
In Keveloh v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:07 pm
” Later in 1995, the court held in Racine v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:32 pm
As the court stated, "The legislature, when it enacted EIPA, could not possibly have intended to permit a person to obtain an exemption simply by checking a box on the Exemption Claim Form, signing that form and timely mailing it back to the judgment creditor's attorney. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:59 am
In 2011, the Venice Commission reversed an anomaly which allowed countries to exclude people with "genuine mental disabilities" from the ballot box. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:08 pm
The case is entitled Sapia et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 11:10 am
In Chattman v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 12:50 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:32 pm
As the court stated, "The legislature, when it enacted EIPA, could not possibly have intended to permit a person to obtain an exemption simply by checking a box on the Exemption Claim Form, signing that form and timely mailing it back to the judgment creditor's attorney. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:00 pm
There is a case entitled United States v. 50,000 Cardboard Boxes, More or Less, Each Containing One Pair of Clacker Balls. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 12:10 pm
If you think that corporations have disproportionate influence in American government, you need only look to the Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 6:11 pm
Here also is a map that summarizes this (from this article); the dark gray states are the ones where this sort of firing is most likely to be illegal: For a case bearing on whether government employers may fire employees for saying, after an assassination attempt on the President, "If they go for him again, I hope they get him," see Rankin v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 4:53 am
It is also important to note that, after the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:01 am
" United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:23 am
As stated in Terro v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:33 am
.), (C.L.S.) v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 2:54 am
Ergul said in his plea agreement that in June 2022 – following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
