Search for: "Brown v. Justice"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 5,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2018, 4:06 am
The Justices did not decide the school desegregation case of Brown v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
“White people hear Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:55 am
Later, Matt Danzer summarized Judge Anna Brown’s ruling in Latif v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:15 am
One good bit of news in all that mess is the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:37 am
Brown v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 10:21 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
Id. at 21-22 (discussing factors for identifying "submarkets" under Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
In Gamble v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am
This evening President Donald Trump is expected to announce his nominee to succeed Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:20 am
(Would Justice Henry Billings Brown have been wrong to think about them when trying to decide whether to pull his draft opinion in Plessy v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
At least as far as I'm aware, in the past, when clerks and others have given tidbits to the press, they have waited until after the relevant case came down, and even then they do so anonymously because this is a clear violation of their obligation of confidentiality.Accordingly, I'm going with theory number 1, which has the virtue of making it possible to think that the consensus is wrong, and thus that there's still a chance that the Court won't overrule Brown… [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 9:00 pm
Maryland had racially segregated schools until the Supreme Court ruled in 1954 in Brown v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Thus, new originalists typically argue that Brown v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 7:47 am
Justice Anthony M. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 3:23 am
In contrast, Justice Cote, with whom Justices Brown and Rowe agreed, stated that “I am concerned that disregarding the applicable law in the alternative forum is inconsistent with the comparative nature of the forum non conveniens analysis” (para 89). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:33 pm
At Monday’s oral argument in DePierre v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
Brown, Eleventh Circuit: Appellant, an inmate, brought a civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
In the recent case (Majchrzak v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 10:11 am
(Mobley v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:50 am
Marshall won 29 out of 32 cases he argued in front of the high court, including Brown v. [read post]
