Search for: "CRIM" Results 2561 - 2580 of 4,178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2010, 2:09 am by sally
Regina v George and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1148; [2010] WLR (D) 147 “Where a statute imposed criminal liability on an individual who dishonestly agreed with one or more other people to do a prohibited act, the intention and purpose was to criminalise that individual, regardless of whether those other persons were also dishonest. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:47 am by Randall Hodgkinson
The COA made a point of noting that the state conceded the application of Graham and Cribbs in the case:Significantly, the State readily agrees with Vontress' claim that the trial court clearly erred in providing PIK Crim. 3d 56.05-A instead of PIK Crim. 3d 56.05-B. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:48 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Divison) Dhorajiwala, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1237 (09 June 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Morge, R (on the application of) v Hampshire County Council [2010] EWCA Civ 608 (10 June 2010) Beechwood Birmingham Ltd v Hoyer Group UK Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 647 (10 June 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Baxter & Ors v McCann [2010] EWHC 1330 (QB) (10 June 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:22 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) So reveals a query through Westlaw’s CRIM-ALL database for off(flag & (desecrat! [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:06 am by Eugene Volokh
[UPDATE: Note, of course, that CRIM-ALL includes only a subset of all prosecutions.] [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:51 am by sally
Regina v Miller [2010] EWCA Crim 1153; [2010] WLR (D) 142 “In criminal proceedings, the circumstances in which one party would be permitted pursuant to s 100(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to ask a witness a question in cross-examination with a view to eliciting an answer implicating that witness in bad behaviour, which behaviour that party would be otherwise unable to prove, were infrequent and limited in scope. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:49 am by sally
Regina v Braithwaite [2010] EWCA Crim 1082; [2010] WLR (D) 141 “Material contained in police crime reports that unproven allegations had been made against a person who was someone other than a defendant, or that that person had been investigated in respect of an offence, would rarely be of substantial probative value to an issue at trial sufficient to render it admissible as evidence of bad character against that person pursuant to s 100(1)(b) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. [read post]