Search for: "Clinton v. Clinton"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 3,308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2010, 9:15 pm
Army from recruiting students from the law school to fill the Judge Advocate General Corps.She also served as an Associate White House Counsel under President Clinton. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 6:30 am
A big question will be how the administration’s proposal will sidestep the Supreme Court’s 1998 Clinton v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:07 am
: How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm
It is worth noting that in the recent United States Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:30 am
(Editors’ Note: See the CAFA Law Blog analysis of Gardner’s companion case, Helms v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 11:04 am
” Williams v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 9:04 am
The case is Alonso v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:00 am
§48 was signed by President Clinton on December 9, 1999. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
“The massive reservoir project in western Palm Beach County was a vital piece of a $7.8 billion restoration project put together by President Bill Clinton in 2000. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
My last post laid the foundations for a discussion of Orin Kerr’s latest law review article, “Applying the Fourth Amendment to the Internet: A General Approach” (2010) 62 Stan.L.Rev. 1005. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Circuit In 1995, President Clinton nominated Garland for an opening on the D.C. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 11:40 am
The Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 7:17 am
Whitman v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:48 pm
This is not quite the case, however, by the Clinton administration’s own admissions. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:56 am
Citing Jegley v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 12:45 pm
We've seen the hard way in the Citizens United case and campaign finance and in Bush v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
