Search for: "Cohen v. Cohen" Results 2561 - 2580 of 3,437
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 4:28 am
He successfully argued on behalf of the Sac and Fox Nation in the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Early Republic Borderlands: Indian Removal, Slavery, and Non-State ActorsChair: David Waldstreicher, Temple University  “Fraught with Disastrous Consequences for our Country”: Cherokee Removal and Nullification, 1824–1839, Nancy Morgan, Temple University  Women at the Crossroads: The Legal and Political Fight to Reverse Indian Removal in Seneca, 1838–1887, Taylor Spence, Yale University Reading Hearts, Not Books: Affective Literacy and Public Sentiment in David… [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:39 pm by Florian Mueller
., due to market share, purchasing power, and other factors.)The Ninth Circuit is working on its Epic Games v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:17 am
[Article 2.2 of the Services Directive expressly excludes a number of services from its scope, including "(d) services in the field of transport, including port services, falling within the scope of Title V of the Treaty". [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:36 pm by William Ford
Matthew Kahn shared the Supreme Court’s per curiam ruling declaring the U.S. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 5:46 am by William Ford
Earlier this week, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 4:36 am by William Ford
Elena Chachko and Amichai Cohen discussed the international legality of the countries’ actions. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:08 pm by Eugene Volokh
” That phrase, like “Fuck the Draft,” would be constitutionally protected speech (at least when not said face-to-face to someone who is likely to be insulted, see Cohen v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:10 am by John Day
  While certain evidentiary issues are discussed, the book is not a treatise on the law of evidence, that subject being left to the fine work of Neil Cohen, Sarah Sheppard and the late, great Donald Paine. [read post]