Search for: "Courts v. Campbell"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 2,915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of argument in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:49 pm
Union Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
People v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 7:04 am
" It's the shorthand we use for the Supreme Court's rulings, in Witherspoon v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 3:39 am
" Here's their rundown: Docket: 08-399 (capital case)Title: Campbell v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:06 pm
Opinion below (District Court for the District of Columbia) Statement as to jurisdiction Motion to dismiss or affirm Reply of appellant Brief amicus curiae of American Civil Rights Union (in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-399 (capital case) Title: Campbell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:45 pm
The Board relied on Dibbs v Campbell (1988) 20 HLR 374 and Bolnore Properties Lrd v Cobb (1996) 29 HLR 2002, as authority for the proposition that the 24 hr break between the tenancies was sufficient to mean that the new one did not follow immediately after the old one. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Supreme Court, October 14, 2008 Moore v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 5:33 pm
CAMPBELL a/k/a Luke Skyywalker, 754 F. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:05 am
") - medical malpractice - settlement dynamics - professional standard of care portion directly concerning the case: pp. 17-48 Campbell v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 10:51 am
Campbell(1994) 8 Cal.4th 975, 980 (Rappleyea).) [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
The Court held that impeaching a co-defendant's out-of-court statement with another out-of-court statement by that defendant does not violate Crawford v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:57 pm
State Citation: 2008 WY 118 Docket Number: S-08-0010 Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, the Honorable Michael N. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:29 pm
Going back to precedent, if fair use grew out of Folsom v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 10:44 pm
Citing the reasoning in the recent Supreme Court decision, Kimbrough v United States that permitted Federal District Courts to consider the "100-1" ratio when considering whether or not to sentence below the federal sentencing guidelines in crack (or cocaine base) cases, Tilem & Campbell asked the Courts to take the ruling one step further and declare the mandatory minimums unconstitutional. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 12:37 pm
The Court quoted extensively from Jensen v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 3:58 pm
State Farm v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:36 pm
As stated by the court:Of critical importance to the issue of personal jurisdiction, [defendant's] attempts at "extra-judicial patent enforcement" were targeted at [the plaintiff's] business activities in Washington and can fairly be characterized as attempts to limit competition from [plaintiff] at the Seattle convention.These activities specifically directed at Washington rendered exercise of jurisdiction fair, and the court accordingly… [read post]
