Search for: "DANIELS v STATE"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 5,630
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:31 am
Back in the United States, the Hill reports that the Department of State has announced plans to bring an average of 1,500 Syrian refugees per month to the United States in order to fulfill President Barack Obama’s goal of settling 10,000 in the country by September. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
” Daniel Bohnen has filed a brief on behalf of UK’s Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) in support of the Sequenom v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:39 am
The Supreme Court, in Imbler v. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 10:57 am
., Lawfare's Editor-in-Chief Ben Wittes and Daniel Weitzner discussed the fallout from the battle between Apple and the FBI and what is likely to come of the debate. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
In its June 2014 decision in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm
The case of Coburn v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:02 am
Related Cases: EFF v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Lisa Inman v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Dionisio v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:41 am
Toward a Structural Critique of American Education, Penn State Law Review, Vol. 119 (2015), he offers this perspective: In his famous dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm
To many, Egan’s speech seemed to endorse in its entirety another MPT, 16 factors that Daniel Bethlehem presented in a 2012 article in the American Journal of International Law. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:18 am
York v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:59 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on last week’s ruling in Evenwel v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 12:27 pm
There are significant additions to the Senate bill that are not presently contained in the House bill, including a whistleblower immunity provision, a shorter statute of limitation (3 years v. 5 years), lower exemplary damages (2 times v. 3 times actual damages), as well as increased criminal penalties for a violation of the Economic Espionage Act and it also includes portions of the DTSA as predicate offenses for the RICO Act. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am
It also alleges that because the properties are part of the Hoey’s marital estate they “can be transferred/assigned” by Thomas to Wendy “as part of a separation/divorce without obtaining” Becker’s consent “[n]otwithstanding the fact that there is a partnership [sic] agreement which states that any sale and/or conveyance must be by unanimous consent. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am
It also alleges that because the properties are part of the Hoey’s marital estate they “can be transferred/assigned” by Thomas to Wendy “as part of a separation/divorce without obtaining” Becker’s consent “[n]otwithstanding the fact that there is a partnership [sic] agreement which states that any sale and/or conveyance must be by unanimous consent. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 7:51 am
Robert Loeb and Helen Klein examined the Al Razak v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:09 am
In an upcoming case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
