Search for: "District of Columbia Government, Appeal of"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 3,634
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2012, 4:10 am
App., Aug. 9, 2012), the District of Columbia's highest appeals court held that the 1st Amendment does not prevent a minister from pursuing a claim for breach of contract against her church. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:46 pm
The government had appealed a District of Columbia Superior Court judge's decision to suppress a gun that police found after making a lawful drunk driving arrest. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 7:32 pm
The Justice Department acknowledges that it has already started restricting when Guantanamo prisoners can challenge their detention in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:34 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:22 am
Since 1996, 17 states and the District of Columbia have adopted some form of legalized marijuana for medical purposes, with California having been the first in 1996. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia concerning the negotiation and receipt of ransom money. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 1:21 am
As shown in a July 27, 2012 opinion from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (here), a misdemeanor conviction based on the Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine can not only result in criminal penalties but can also include “career-ending” consequences, in the form of a lengthy ban from participating in governmental programs. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 12:55 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s brief order came in response to the third request by the Electronic Privacy Information Center for the court to enforce its order. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 10:32 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in April 2011. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:27 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld an airline-advertising rule, remanded part of a health care exclusion decision, and declined to stay a political advertisement disclosure rule. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:27 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld an airline-advertising rule, remanded part of a health care exclusion decision, and declined to stay a political advertisement disclosure rule. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:36 pm
Attorney's office for the District of Columbia declined to comment. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:11 am
Both the district court, in its April 27 ruling, and the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Van Hollen, No. 12-5117 (D.C. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:27 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, accusing officials of orchestrating General Gholam Ali Oveissi's death. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:08 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, illustrating that federal rules governing Hours of Service would add tremendous cost to the economy and undue burden onto drivers while providing minimal possible safety benefits. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:08 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, illustrating that federal rules governing Hours of Service would add tremendous cost to the economy and undue burden onto drivers while providing minimal possible safety benefits. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:03 am
Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia have passed Anti-SLAPP or “Anti Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation” legislation to deter the proliferation of defamation suits brought on by social media. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 4:03 am
Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia have passed Anti-SLAPP or “Anti Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation” legislation to deter the proliferation of defamation suits brought on by social media. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:34 am
Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, is supervising the filter team. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
Dept. of Transportation (No. 11-1219), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia decided 2-1 to uphold the constitutional validity of a DOT rule that restricts how airlines can display a break down of how much of a passenger's airfare goes toward taxes and fees.Judge David S. [read post]
