Search for: "Doe v. Lee" Results 2561 - 2580 of 3,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eric Claeys
(For the record, much of that dicta became reasons for decision the very same day—in Roe's companion case, Doe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am by Jacob Schulz
Lenawee County, Michigan, had an apocalyptic Christian nationalist militia problem about a decade ago. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
.” It seems to me that the Constitution is very clear that copyright does not exist inherently for the author but for the benefit for society at large. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am by Terry Hart
” It seems to me that the Constitution is very clear that copyright does not exist inherently for the author but for the benefit for society at large. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 12:18 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
[Note to readers: This morning, the Supreme Court handed down a decision in Moore v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
The authors in the series have included truly remarkable scholars, including not only the individuals you mention above, but also Cass Sunstein, Pam Karlan, Lee Bollinger, Mark Tushnet, Michael Klarman, and on and on and on. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am by John Ramming Chappell
Resolutions may also request “such other information as such committee or such House may request,” as the Murphy-Lee resolution does around end-use monitoring of U.S. weapon sales to Saudi Arabia for use in Yemen and a description of U.S. government actions regarding alleged abuses by Saudi Arabia against U.S. citizens, among other issues. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
The Open Rights Group have published a report which reveals that the data of individuals referred to the counter-terrorism Prevent programme is widely shared – with airports, ports and immigration services – and retained for years, even when a case does not meet the threshold for further investigation. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Does that make a difference? [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
  Third, the order does not require parties to redact exhibits. [read post]