Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 13,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2010, 3:00 pm
As public employees were exempt from all but two of the wage orders in effect in 1997, Wage Order No. 17 does not apply to CDCR employees. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 3:44 pm
See Department of Labor regulations on FMLA located at 29 CFR Chap. 825. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:58 am
Rptr. 3d 50, 136 P.3d 845 (June 29, 2006). [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:15 am
April 29, 2008) ("[T]he automobile exception allows the search of the cell phone just as it allows a search of other closed containers found in vehicles. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
At the same time Ofcom published its “fit and proper” assessment [pdf], concluding that “the behaviours alleged at Fox News amount to significant corporate failure, however the overall evidence available to date does not provide a reasonable basis to conclude that if Sky were 100% owned and controlled by Fox, it would not be fit and proper to hold broadcast licences”. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
Id. at *28-29 (text added).Holdings[1: Irreparable Harm] [W]e reject Apple’s arguments and confirm that the district court was correct to require a showing of some causal nexus between Samsung’s infringing conduct and Apple’s alleged harm [because causal nexus is an necessary part of the irreparable harm inquiry that must be satisfied, irrespective of the type of product encompassed by the patent]. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 2:48 pm
As my dad always told me: ‘ask a silly question…’ Question 1: What does the family justice system mean to you? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Spain International Extradition Treaty with the United States May 29, 1970, Date-Signed June 16, 1971, Date-In-Force STATUS: Treaty signed at Madrid on May 29, 1970. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 7:31 am
See 29 C.F.R. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 12:26 pm
”*The court rejected DOE motion to dismiss Mendez’s petition as untimely, noting that:1. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:46 am
When does a lack of clarity "arise out of" an amendment? [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:00 am
There, the CJEU held that – while the mere provision of physical facilities does not as such amount to communication to the public in accordance with recital 27 – the installation of such facilities and the distribution of a signal by means of television sets by a hotel to customers staying in its rooms, whatever technique is used to transmit the signal, does constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive… [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 3:34 am
[possibly 'no', courtesy of para 41 in the Cassina decision: "the concept of distribution to the public, otherwise than through sale, of the original of a work or a copy thereof, for the purpose of Article 4(1) of Directive 2001/29, applies only where there is a transfer of the ownership of that object. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 8:25 am
On the contrary, the comparison must be made by examining each of the marks in question as a whole… The Court of Justice has made clear that the fact that an element is not negligible does not mean that it is dominant, just as the fact that an element is not dominant by no means implies that it is negligible’ (paragraph 29) ‘Where a sign consists of both figurative and word elements, it does not automatically follow that it is the word element… [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
Unfashionable as it may appear, I consider that there is much to be said in this area for asking a judge to rule on whether the case is capable of passing the s.1 test, or on the other hand whether the defendant has any real prospect of establishing that it does not. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
Does s. 753(1) preclude sentencing judges from considering future treatment prospects before designating an offender as dangerous? [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 8:22 pm
How sick does someone have to be to post something like that? [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 3:34 am
Some say china has decoupled (in part or whole), while others say if US goes down, so does China. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm
Here is the discussion from the footnote on page 15 of the Solicitor General brief: * Amici Professors of Second Amendment Law accept (Br. 28-29) the validity of Section 922(g)(8)(C)(i) because it "requires a judicial finding of dangerousness" but reject Section 922(g)(8)(C)(ii) because it does not require a specific finding. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:27 am
These “Group 1” banks are defined as internationally active banks that have Tier 1 capital of more than €3 billion, and include all 29 institutions that have been designated as global systemically important banks (G-SIBs). [read post]
