Search for: "Does 1 - 38" Results 2561 - 2580 of 4,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2022, 2:52 pm by Emily Theriault
Looking at these two processes together, it is clear that the government does not take a one-size-fits-all approach to its various small business programs. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dynascan Corp., 38 F.3d 1161 (11th Cir.1994) (per curiam) (affirming extraterritorial application of the Lanham Act where a U.S. corporation purchased infringing products to sell exclusively to consumers in South America). [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
There must have been an awful lot of evidence to read, because it wasn't until January 2010 that the Opposition Division dismissed the Article 8(1)(b) opposition since there was no likelihood of confusion. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 11:52 am
, African Development Bank Working Paper Series, No. 142-December 2011, p. 9).Mauritania is neither a signatory of the Santiago principles nor does its transparency rating appear high (LM of 1) (Ibid, 11). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:54 am by Florian Mueller
On August 1, the USPTO decided to reexamine various claims of the '172 patent (click on the image to enlarge):The claims undergoing reexamination now are claims 1-6, 8-15, and 17-38. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 1:26 pm
              According to the court, at *23: “The totality of the circumstances does include an evaluation of subjective good faith, but mostly as a negative. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
Honest concurrent use specifically concerns registered trade marks (section 20(1)). [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:55 am by Susan Brenner
It began when, on December 3, 2009, at 1:38 p.m., the case was submitted to the jury. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:49 am by Eric Biber
 First, the UCS report does include analysis on a hour-by-hour basis in Appendix A. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:32 pm by MacIsaac
 9(1) of the Court of Appeal Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
   The Court agreed with the judge, holding that “the fact that divulging of private information and material in relation to the partner and child of the appellant may have entitled them to pursue their own claim for a remedy does not mean that the appellant does not have a claim. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm by Paul M. Secunda
  (a) Obama did very well in exit polls (winning 45%-38%) among the voters. [read post]