Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 2561 - 2580 of 41,640
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xvii]  Still operating today, the system is measured in hours, with one hour equaling $10. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:22 am by Roel van Woudenberg
This, however, does not turn this Rule 137(4) EPC communication into a substantive communication under Article 94(3) and Rule 71(1) EPC, especially as the period for a reply is still only one month. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It remains however to be established if this also applies to the objections under A 54 and A 56. [10] The subject matter of claim 1 of the main request is a replication defective pseudotyped HIV-based retrovirus. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:25 pm by Gregg H. Dooge
  For example: (1)      The 10 largest companies in the S&P 500 comprise almost 30% of the index. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It is not easy to prove that something does not work, and you certainly have to provide good evidence, as the present decision illustrates.Claim 1 of the main request on file read:1. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 8:52 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
EADs for current Venezuelan TPS beneficiaries will be automatically extended through March 10, 2025. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  On August 10, 2023, a human resources employee emailed petitioner and stated:  “[a]fter review of the medical documentation by the DOE doctor, restoration of health leave has been advised. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  On August 10, 2023, a human resources employee emailed petitioner and stated:  “[a]fter review of the medical documentation by the DOE doctor, restoration of health leave has been advised. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
The questions asked here are these: 1(a) If anyone other than the copyright holder refers by means of a hyperlink on a website controlled by him to a website which is managed by a third party and is accessible to the general internet public, on which the work has been made available without the consent of the rightholder, does that constitute a ‘communication to the public’ within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29? [read post]