Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 5,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2011, 2:30 pm
So, in summary, what does this tell us? [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 12:01 pm
” 39 Int’l Enforcement L. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:16 am
[7] Id. at 39 (internal citations omitted). [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:58 am
Dec. 1, 2020). [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:17 pm
— 31 (1)? [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
Complete text of bill is below, but here are the bullet points:Conditions covered - Cancer, AIDS or Parkinson's DiseasePhysician certifies its use.Potency "the specific concentrations of individual cannabinoids that must be present to treat the patient's condition," Limited to a 30-day supply.Dispensaries approved by county commissionFlorida Medical Marijuana - Complete Text of Proposed 2015 LawFlorida Senate - 2015 SB 528By Senator… [read post]
29 May 2019, 10:59 am
No revenue or asset threshold.[38] Same as NAIC model.[39] Same as NY Regulation.[40] Fewer than 25 employees. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:37 pm
(The FCC does not state how many bits per second it considers necessary for an SD stream.) [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 6:03 am
§ 1-39-118(b) (LexisNexis 2007) by purchasing insurance coverage for employment claims. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 11:03 am
Conclusion The Indian Constitution under Article 39(f) and 45 directs the best interest of children and promises equal opportunities and care to them. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:19 pm
In Canada, oil, edible products, extracts, and topicals are taxed at 1 cent (CAD) per milligram of THC. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 2:50 pm
Curiously, as opposed to the TCPA and other Mini-TCPAs, mere use of an ADAD does not trigger liability. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 pm
The complaint alleges that “Uber’s S-1 claimed a market share of greater than 65% in the United States and Canada, a claim that further undermined Lyft’s purported claim of 39% market share. [read post]
7 May 2008, 11:28 am
It does seem to have been a truly egregious case. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:22 am
It seems that this exception contained in Article 31(1)(c) does not include ordinary contracts incidental to life in the receiving state, such as a contract for domestic services. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 12:01 pm
Does the defendant get his life back or does everyone figure he "got away with it"? [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:22 am
It seems that this exception contained in Article 31(1)(c) does not include ordinary contracts incidental to life in the receiving state, such as a contract for domestic services. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
In earlier posts I have dealt with general concerns about the Defamation Act 2013 and concerns about section 1, “Serious harm”. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 9:38 am
App., 1st Cir., 77 So 3d 39 (2011) (Which held that La. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:06 am
While this aim was considered legitimate, the “blanket priority” was not considered proportionate or necessary by the Tribunal for the following reasons (at p16): “1. [read post]
