Search for: "Estate of Smith" Results 2561 - 2580 of 3,061
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2020, 9:40 am by Mark S. Goldstein and Heather Martone
  Reed Smith’s attorneys are monitoring New York’s actions in response to COVID-19 and their related impact on employers. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 4:04 am
A tip of the hat to Todd Smith, whose Texas Appellate Law Blog ask Texas lawyers to haul out the videocam, and enter the state bar association YouTube contest. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Two companies associated with the Hendrix estate asserted Times Newspapers had not obtained proper copyright clearance, and pursued damages for lost earnings. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:14 am
Smith, 235 NJ Super 453 (Law Div.), aff’d 235 NJ Super 404 (App. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:27 pm by Sam Glover
You don’t want to be waiting around for things to print the night before a trial or real estate closing. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Wednesday 20 July 2011, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in R v Smith which was heard on 16 June 2011. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:03 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Chancers of the week go to Messrs Mew & Just, reported on the excellent Pain Smith Blog two occupants of houseboats that could no longer float and had been attached to some pilings to stop them sinking, which were themselves attached to land owned by Tristmire Ltd tried to argue that in being now physically attached to the land they were in fact Assured Tenants. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Wills & Estates: Undue Influence; Resulting Trusts; Proprietary EstoppelCowper-Smith v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 9:50 am
Smith, 142 Cal.App.4th 1154 (2006), in which another panel of the Court of Appeal held that the putative spouse doctrine could not be used by domestic partners. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm by Law Lady
Medtronic Inc., 19 No. 19 Westlaw Journal Medical Devices 9, Westlaw Journal Medical Devices November 5, 2012Finding the causes of action barred by federal law, a Florida federal judge has dismissed negligence and failure-to-warn claims against Medtronic by the estate of a woman who died after her EnPulse pacemaker failed after five years of use. [read post]