Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 61,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 10:12 am
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:58 pm
Raffel Systems, LLC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 7:28 pm
” The court applied the Wang v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 12:58 pm
"The reliability of crime labs has been questioned in several states... [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:52 am
The Court agreed, noting that the skimpy record below gave little reason to overturn the judge's decision below in denying the TRO, given the petitioner's burden to prove 1) the likelihood that the petitioner would succeed on the merits, 2) the 'balance of inconvenience' between granting or denying the TRO, 3) the petitioner would suffer irreparable injury, and 4) the public interest.The Court also rejected the petitioner's argument that Lamb v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 12:04 pm
In Carr v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 2:07 pm
" In Smith v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 6:33 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 6:16 am
Merit Decision On December 6, 2012, the Supreme Court handed down a merit decision in Doss v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 5:47 am
The complaint (full text) in State of California v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:13 am
Matter of Albert D’Agostino v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller Petitioner in this Article 78 case is an attorney who worked part time as counsel for several municipalities and school districts in addition to maintaining a private law practice. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Hunter v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 3:26 am
In Battery Alliance, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:13 pm
Global Aerospace, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:13 pm
Global Aerospace, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 3:29 am
" Primerica, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 1:49 am
This involves a different state of mind to recklessness. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:58 am
In an earlier post on this blog, I considered the potential impact on the First Amendment of Thomas J’s originalist reasoning in the Second Amendment case of New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v Bruen, and found some distinctly chilly zephyrs. [read post]
