Search for: "House of Congress Employment"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 5,071
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2015, 9:37 am
§ 6301 et seq., requires the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development to use procurement contracts rather than cooperative agreements as the legal instruments for conveying federal funds to state and local public housing agencies in connection with programs under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 6:01 am
Both reactions tend to focus on many of the same issues raised by some members of Congress. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 7:41 am
Controlling both houses of Congress, Republican leaders forced Democrats to vote on the proposed amendment, even though it had no realistic chance of passing. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:46 pm
A few months ago, a guy from the Heritage Foundation wrote an opinion piece for Fox News about the 2014 congressional elections, which secured Republican majorities in both Houses of Congress. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:03 am
Congress will continue to oppose this radical assault on workers and employers, and we will continue to demand a fair union election process. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 8:32 am
By John Husband and Brad Williams On March 31, 2015, President Obama vetoed a joint resolution passed by both houses of Congress that sought to overturn the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB’s) rules designed to speed up the union election process. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 5:03 am
UPS, and the new state of pregnancy accommodation law — via Phil Miles’s Lawffice Space Pregnancy accommodation FAQs for employers — via Robin Shea’s Employment & Labor Insider What Connecticut Employers Need To Know About Young v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 6:08 am
However, that disapproval is subject to a presidential veto that may be overridden by a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Congress. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:43 pm
By Ada Dolph, Christopher Robertson, and Robert Milligan The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced today that it had made good on its prior promises to take a hard look at employment agreements and policies that could be viewed as attempting to keep securities fraud complaints in-house. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:56 am
But in Employment Division v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:10 am
Powell continued to be a rabble-rouser in Congress. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
You will also find the court case referred to in legal texts, on sport, employment, contract, and tort law. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:42 pm
The new Republican Majority in Congress is moving quickly to attack and overturn a series of pro-union rules implemented under the leadership of the Obama Administration. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:49 am
While the employer community waits for these EEOC regulations, Congress introduced the Preserving Employee Wellness Program Act (H.R. 1189) in early March to provide guidance on wellness programs. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:47 am
— via Eric Meyer’s The Employer Handbook Blog DOL Secretary Tells Congress New FLSA Regulations Are Delayed, Outlines Department Priorities — via Wage & Hour Insights When Isn’t Your Employee Eligible for FMLA Leave? [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:14 am
This year, let’s all come together – Congress, the White House, and businesses from Wall Street to Main Street – to give every woman the opportunity she deserves. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:47 pm
Although it's clear that Congress has the power to legislate about bankruptcy under the U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:03 pm
There’s the White House plan, announced in January. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Second, at the same moment that the Court allowed Congress greater leeway in regulating economic matters previously thought reserved to the states, it abandoned the view that federal, state, or local regulation of such matters as hours, wages, and conditions of employment should be rigorously scrutinized by courts aiming to protect individual economic liberty. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 10:16 am
The Republican-led Congress has been working to block the new rules from taking effect, but the expectation is that even if such a bill passes both the House and the Senate, it is likely to be met with a Presidential veto. [read post]
