Search for: "In Re German"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 4,384
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2012, 4:40 am
That turned out to be a big success and has now been re-done and is available (should you be interested) >> here. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 2:00 pm
Third—and my colleague Mike German gets credit for this insight—when somebody gets snagged by these dragnets, it’s very difficult to clear the “cloud of suspicion. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
The applicant did not pay a supplementary search fee (which was still possible at that time, even though the EPO had acted as ISA) but filed a new set of claims comprising a method claim and a device claim (both of which were mixes of features of inventions 1 and 2 according to the ISA).On October 18, 2010, the ED refused the application and justified this refusal by pointing out that the claims corresponded to invention 2, which had not been searched, which meant that the claims on file did not… [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 6:57 pm
We’re ready to help you! [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 6:36 am
Might this re-trigger an armed conflict? [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:36 pm
Show Notes About the Hosts Jonathan Bailey Jonathan Bailey (@plagiarismtoday) is the Webmaster and author of Plagiarism Today (Hint: You’re there now) and works as a copyright and plagiarism consultant. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
The organization that had developed the campaign, the German branch of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), which is called PETA-Deutschland (or PETA-D for short), challenged a Berlin regional court’s 2004 injunction against publication of the poster campaign. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 3:38 am
In the Brisbane German Klub, of all places. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:30 am
(Qatada was arrested and questioned in February 2001 about a German terrorist cell. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
DE10040386 (B4) is the German equivalent of U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 9:35 pm
A comparable description re such US law is found with no other business law firm of this kind and size on a nationwide level. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 6:12 pm
Also, under German civil procedure law the concept res judicata is very restrictive and the reasoning of a judgment does often not participate in the res judicata effect. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
On July 23, 2012, the applicant made further written submissions.The Board found the request for re-establishment admissible and then dealt with its allowability:*** Translation of the German original ***The persons having to exercise all due care within the meaning of A 122(1)[5.1] The request is allowable if, in spite of all due care, the applicant was hindered from meeting the time limit for filing the statement of grounds of appeal, the non-observance of which had the direct… [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 4:24 pm
You’re kidding me. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 11:43 pm
(The "h" is breathy and wet, like the soft "ch" of "ich" in German, for example, but that's precisely the sort of nuance I'm going to ignore for the most part in this post.) 3. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
For those who want the real thing, just read on:*** Translation of the German original ***Admissibility – Procedural violation (a)[1] At first sight it appears that the parties, as far as the admissibility of the petition for review in view of procedural violation (a) is concerned, are stuck in a dispute regarding the facts of the case and, consequently, contradictory arguments. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 1:24 am
Wherever possible, legal information should be promulgated using open technical standards that make republication and re-use easier. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 3:21 am
It explained: “If the German court has ruled by now on the motion to quash, and has quashed service, Plaintiffs may re-file the motion to serve by an alternate method, § 1608(b)(3)(C), but Plaintiffs must explain specifically how the proposed alternative is “consistent with the law of the place where service is to be made,” id. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 3:21 am
It explained: “If the German court has ruled by now on the motion to quash, and has quashed service, Plaintiffs may re-file the motion to serve by an alternate method, § 1608(b)(3)(C), but Plaintiffs must explain specifically how the proposed alternative is “consistent with the law of the place where service is to be made,” id. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:07 pm
Daniel Robinson in Support of Ex parte Application (In re: Ex Parte Application of Apple, Inc., et al.) [read post]
