Search for: "In re Human Rights Commission"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 3,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
Applying the relevant principles and considering the Human Rights Act 1998, s 2(4) and whether the threshold test in s 12(3) concerning the right to freedom of expression was satisfied, an interim injunction was therefore necessary. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 1:48 pm
But it’s natural to China to censor human rights sites. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 2:03 am
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Read More: Anonymity ain’t here anymore for Take That’s Howard Donald Anonymity refused in privacy case – despite agreement of parties Newspaper prevented from publishing information about former loyalist murder suspect [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 4:50 am
Humanitarian Law Project, the same majority, this time joined by Justice John Paul Stevens, ruled that the First Amendment permits Congress to imprison human rights activists for up to fifteen years merely for advising militant organizations on ways to reject violence and pursue their disputes through lawful means. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:47 am
This comes at the cost of human capital depreciation for older workers. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 1:34 pm
The human body is made up of 60 trillion cells. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 10:01 pm
T.J.Graham, [1957] 1 QB 169, “A company may in many ways be likened to a human body. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 3:12 pm
And we’re not alone. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:53 am
I’m still trying to resolve a complaint with the Human Rights Commission on how many minorities I’m supposed to hire for my building crew. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 7:32 am
The basic assumption contained in the Declaration – that the implementation of minority rights contributes to the stability of States – has been taken up and developed in successive resolutions of the General Assembly, the Commission on Human Rights, its successor the Human Rights Council, reports of the UN Secretary-General and outcome documents of a number of conferences and policy processes, including the Durban Declaration and… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
Most involve excessive use of antibiotics.In a mail survey sent out to a nationally representative sample of consumers, antibiotics rated third of eight concerns cited, with pesticides and artificial growth hormones at the top of the list.In the first survey the dairy farmers participated in, more than one-third of the respondents said they believed that antibiotics that worked well in the past were no longer as effective for treating the same conditions.Most of the respondents agreed that… [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 11:03 pm
We are pleased to welcome this guest post responding to recent developments (post) from two HRinI alumni-James Smith and Maeve O’Rourke-on behalf of Justice for Magdalenes Justice for Magdalenes (JFM), the survivor advocacy group, warmly welcomes the Irish Human Rights Commission’s assessment of the possible human rights violations arising from the treatment of women and young girls in Magdalene Laundries. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 1:54 pm
Human Relations Comm'n, 413 U. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Cochrane predated the coming into force of the Human Rights Act 1998, but in McLellan the CA held that the IT scheme was compatible with art.6 of the Convention. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Cochrane predated the coming into force of the Human Rights Act 1998, but in McLellan the CA held that the IT scheme was compatible with art.6 of the Convention. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:38 am
Try it another way – even conceding that the residents are illegal, by that act have they forfeited their human rights? [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:11 am
We're all for free speech. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:17 am
Ontario (Human Rights Commission), 2002 SCC 66 (CanLII), [2002] 3 S.C.R. 403, at para. 56, it is not appropriate, when interpreting human rights statutes, to impose additional burdens. [read post]
