Search for: "Jones v. United States"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 3,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
” United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:27 am
Oct. 15, 2008), a unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the summary judgment granted to Bayer by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, holding that Bayer’s settlement of patent litigation with a generic pharmaceutical manufacturer did not violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:15 am
James Gildea issued the Initial Determination (“ID”) finding that Samsung had not violated Section 337 in connection with the importation into the United States, sale for importation, or sale within the United States after importation of certain multi-layer ceramic capacitors by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:56 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States had already banned the app. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:02 am
Comm’r, 631 F.3d 115 (3d Cir. 2011); Jones v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
Religious freedom in the EU: a US perspective The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has released an Issue Update: Religious Freedom Concerns in The European Union. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:04 am
United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 1:30 am
United States, 510 U.S. 540, 550–51 (1994) (internal quotations omitted). [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 9:03 am
Jones, Edicts of Government: Copyright in State Legal MaterialsCompendium: policy, won’t register a gov’t edict issued by state in other jurisdiction, including legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
In January 2012, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
” The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:40 am
This year, however, the Court has released 21, including blockbusters United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:29 pm
United States, further paring back applicability of the exclusionary rule, while Sotomayor penned J.B.D. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:16 pm
" What makes Chi's case different from Medellin's, according to lawyer Morris Moon from the Texas Defender Service, is that Chi is covered by a separate treaty between Honduras and the United States, not just the broad-based Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 9:28 pm
"What makes Chi's case different from Medellin's, according to lawyer Morris Moon from the Texas Defender Service, is that Chi is covered by a separate treaty between Honduras and the United States, not just the broad-based Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981) [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 11:15 pm
Harlan worries that the amount under guidelines will set off an appeal in the Second Circuit.Harlan is right back to us on Saturday morning with this post concerning whether the Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
