Search for: "MATTER OF J C B"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 3,065
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 9:00 am
Hance, Jr. 62,500 208,333 0 0 270,833 C. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:24 pm
") (Plager, J., concurring). [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Broadly: divorce, civil partnership and financial matters are not 'relevant family proceedings'. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:52 am
§ 1367(c)(2). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
Kemp and Dan C. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
The invention at issue is claimed to be a "process," which §100(b) defines as a "process, art or method, and includes a new use of a known process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or material. [read post]
Bilski v. Kappos: SCOTUS Doesn't Recognize Business Methods Patents But Doesn't Prohibit Them Either
28 Jun 2010, 12:07 pm
Schipper, & J. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 4:54 am
In his view *it was clear from the Patents Act 1977 s.7(2) that a patentable invention was "property" and that the inventor was the first owner of that property unless one of the circumstances mentioned in s.7(2)(b) applied;* if s.7(2)(b) did apply, so that another person was entitled to the whole of the property in the invention before it was made, that other person was then entitled to apply for and be granted a patent, and if the inventor assigned the property in the… [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm
J. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 8:41 am
I should point out that this case was decided relying on the current BC Supreme Court Rule 40A(5)(c). [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
The matter would fall to be determined under Article 8 alone. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:17 pm
C-48-Civil-2009-14369 (Northampton Co. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:46 pm
See OB-GYN Assoc., 259 Ga. at 668(2), 386 S.E.2d 146(C). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:08 pm
(c) The extent of his capacity to perceive, to recollect, or to communicate any matter about which he testifies. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:08 pm
(c) The extent of his capacity to perceive, to recollect, or to communicate any matter about which he testifies. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm
R&TC Section 17014(b) provides a special rule for certain United States Government officials and their spouses. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:56 am
KENNEDY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
Subtracting the Schedule J figure from the Schedule I figure resulted i [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Stat. 120.57(1)(c). [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Katherine J. [read post]