Search for: "REED v. REED" Results 2561 - 2580 of 3,268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
A change in course does not end a case where a plaintiff seeks damages for past wrongs, but where, as in Trump v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am by CMS
(Fourth issue) The Supreme Court’s judgment  Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Kitchin, with whom Lord Hodge agreed, gave the majority judgment, with Lord Carnwath dissenting in part. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:30 am by Lisa McElroy
Reed (a case about whether a privacy concerning a signature on a political petition is protected by the First Amendment). [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
On Thursday 13 June 2024, there were hearings in Nicholas James Gwilliam v (1) Stephen Thomas Freeman (2) John William Freeman QB-2021-000981 and Tyndal v Obisulu KB-2024-001333. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm by Kelly
(IPBiz) Australia FCA: No copyright in newspaper headlines: Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm by Mike
June 23, 2010) (rejecting defendant’s argument that amount in controversy was satisfied because the plaintiff was seeking a modification of a $448,000 loan and an injunction to enjoin any foreclosure sale of the property); see also Reed v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 8:33 am by John Hochfelder
Generally, pain and suffering awards in brain damage cases that are sustained in excess of $1,000,000 involve much longer periods of time, such as: Reed v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:35 pm by Hank Fasthoff
  It provides a defense to an infringement claim when the alleged similarities are merely the use of (i) common scenes or themes, see Reed-Union Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 6:36 pm
            This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
While the "essential function" of the trade mark in Europe is "to guarantee the identity of origin of the marked goods or services to the consumer or end user by enabling him, without any possibility of confusion, to distinguish the goods or services from others which have another origin" (Case C-206/01 Arsenal v Reed)the protection is given not to the consumer but to the trade mark owner as guarantor of the identity of the origin of the marked goods. [read post]