Search for: "STATE v. STEVENS"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 7,827
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2022, 12:18 pm
Writing for the Court, Justice Steven Breyer noted that other cities, like San Jose, have a clear policy which states that flagpoles are not forums for public expression. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
SMITH: Your Honor, my main ground today is exactly that, that this Court said last year in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:39 am
From the NYT editorial about Perry v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 8:22 am
Mendoza v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 3:49 am
In Buckley v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 am
Post, at 15-16, n. 10 (opinion of STEVENS, J.). [read post]
26 May 2009, 8:59 am
The decision below, which held for the state, is reversed and remanded in a 5-4 opinion by Justice Stevens, available here. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
It was a facial challenge that failed in state courts. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:58 am
.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 6:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:09 am
Shatzer and Florida v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 6:40 am
The state could have won its challenge to Stevens' habeas petition, but instead Stevens wins even though the Court of Appeals has rejected the legal predicate for that petition in the en banc ruling in Besser. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 10:01 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 3:10 am
The state's brief stresses the age of the victim. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 2:02 pm
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
Filler fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because there is no compensable property interest in a medical license for purposes of the Takings Clause.Filler v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Amy Dillard discusses Hall v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:38 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie argues that, although Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s pledge to reverse the effects of the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
