Search for: "State v. Davis "
Results 2561 - 2580
of 6,078
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
But an even bigger development (that I shall elaborate in the space below) turns out to be an action not by an elected state legislature, but instead by the Supreme Court in last month’s ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 3:08 pm
”***Remember United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:22 am
Kachina Pipeline Company v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:53 am
Article L.851-3 starts by stating that the processing should not allow the identification of individuals. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
Davis, 954 F.2d 182, 185-86 (4th Cir. 1992); State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 10:59 am
The new policy was prompted in part by an investigation by Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights and a report by the California State Auditor.The policy states in relevant parts:H. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:09 pm
There is some confusion regarding from what case this appeal stems, as Davis was involved in a series of criminal cases: ... [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 7:27 am
Summary judgment was affirmed (Davis v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm
CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
Criminal procedure — Voir dire — Bias toward state’s witnesses Appellant, Jason Davis, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County of three counts of second-degree burglary, three counts of misdemeanor theft, and four counts of malicious destruction of property. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 9:44 am
The case was State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
Davis v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
In a very rare outcome, in the case of R (Davis and ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin) the Divisional Court declared that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act 2014 (DRIPA) is inconsistent with European Union law and therefore is “disapplied”, although the Court suspended the effect of its order until after 31 March 2016. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:33 am
To read the entire Court of Appeals’ opinion, see Davis-Lynch, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:38 am
David Davis MP, Tom Watson MP and Others v the Secretary of State for the Home Department Today, the High Court found against the Government in David Davis’s and Tom Watson’s joint legal challenge to the Government’s emergency surveillance legislation. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
To be sure, Obamacare subsidies in federal-exchange states were taking place before the Court affirmed their validity in King v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
No surprise after United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 6:46 am
” Davis v. [read post]
