Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 26,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2008, 10:30 am
In Reid v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:30 am
Represented by lawyers for the state, Chapman came to the Supreme Court last year, asking the justices to take up her case and weigh in on the question of immunity – including whether, in the wake of the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:04 am
That son lived abroad (in a country quaintly termed “Ruritania” in the judgment) with his mother. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
Ct., Nov. 15, 2022), a Georgia state trial court enjoined enforcement of two sections of Georgia's Living Infants Fairness and Equality (LIFE) Act which was enacted in 2019. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:22 am
The complaint (full text) in Californians for Equal Rights Foundation v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 6:39 am
The complaint (full text) in C.F. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
Supreme Court opinion in Chae Chan Ping v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:22 pm
Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 4:10 am
In Kumar v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 6:01 am
In Ates v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) Kelly v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 12:00 am
" It is worth noting that despite the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently heard argument in Glossip v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:30 am
(View a more detailed post here.)State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 6:12 am
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2006, 6:29 am
In the latest case from the 3rd District, the panel reversed the domestic violence conviction of David Shaffer in Union County that involved his live-in girlfriend. [read post]
27 Dec 2024, 9:01 pm
The court further stated that the amount stipulated in the foreign judgment was not excessive or inconsistent with Japanese public policy, given the actual living expenses of the children. [read post]
