Search for: "Stephens v. United States" Results 2561 - 2580 of 3,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 6:03 pm by Michel-Adrien
The Legal Information Institute (LII) at Cornell Law School has posted an article outlining the major decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States for the 2011-2012 term.From the introduction:"The 2011-2012 Supreme Court Term marks the first time in three years that there was not a new justice on the bench. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:05 am by Brian A. Comer
Hinson, Executive Director United States Consumer Product Safety DivisionWashington, D.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 10:08 am by Kali Borkoski
§ 1350, allows courts to recognize a cause of action for violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:31 pm by Steven Boutwell
Another group of courts found that the exclusion was ambiguous or required to be interpreted based on history of the exclusion and looked at the presentations of the insurance industry to the various insurance commissioners in the various states “Doer v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:03 am by Maryland Law Review
United States: Good Faith, Retroactivity, and the Loss of Principle Brandon K. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 1:47 pm by Lawrence Solum
The heart of the Article is a historical review of executive branch decisionmaking with respect to the five major military conflicts the United States has fought. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 10:52 am
As to what would happen in the United States (at least as of 2009, the date of the course materials) the course materials summarize as follows: “On the issue of whether the religion of one parent can be dispositive of the issue of custody, there is little law in the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 6:06 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 In SCOTUSBlog, Professor Stephen Vladeck wondered how much was truly left of the Webster v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am by Francis Pileggi
Finally, a review of the details of the decision follows: Background of Pyott case: In September 2010, Allergan, Inc. entered into a settlement with the United States Department of Justice and pled guilty to criminal misdemeanor misbranding and paid a total of $600 million in civil and criminal fees. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 5:15 pm by Lovechilde
”  Flatow points out that, "A supermajority of Montanans thought otherwise when they passed the Corrupt Practices Act in 1912," and as Justice Stephen Breyer wrote in his dissent, “Montana’s experience, like considerable experience elsewhere since the Court’s decision in Citizens United, casts grave doubt on the Court’s supposition that independent expenditures do not corrupt or appear to do so. [read post]