Search for: "Strange v. Strange"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 3,726
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
So Professor Connell told the class about the race of the individuals, and asked them if that should matter — essentially correcting the strange absence of that issue in the Kaplan casebook. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:45 am
That seems a little strange. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:39 pm
Human Cells and the Strange Effects of Property & Intellectual Property Law by Robin Feldman (U.C. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 4:03 pm
However, this was exactly the case in the Court’s recent opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:33 pm
At Monday’s oral argument in DePierre v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:24 pm
IPKat reader and enthusiast Carlton Daniel (Squire, Sanders & Dempsey (UK) LLP) was so excited about the nearly-recent decision in Office of Fair Trading v Purely Creative (Chancery Division, England and Wales) [2011] EWHC 106 (Ch) that he offered to write it up for us. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:18 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
Clark and Simple Pleading: Against a “Formalism of Generality” [citation] Peter Julian Cooper Technologies Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:21 pm
USA v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:36 pm
I just finished reading Snyder v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:00 am
This reviews and links to Posner's article, as well as the earlier article by Ian Gallacher, Cite Unseen: How Neutral Citation and America's Law Schools Can Cure Our Strange Devotion to Bibliographical Orthodoxy and the Constriction of Open and Equal Access to the Law, 70 Alb. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:19 am
But, it is worth discussing the importance of FCC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
In this week’s case (Biehl v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:25 am
I find that argument quite strange. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:10 am
That is seen as capitalism in action [Strange how, at the bottom level, banks are so reluctant to take even the smallest of risks, while they seem to throw caution to the winds when it comes to buying subprime mortgage portfolios and investing in financial paper of which they have manifestly little understanding] 3. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 6:20 pm
(Orin Kerr) Over at Prawfs, Steve Vladeck has an extended response to my recent post, The Strange Case of Ashcroft v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:41 pm
Suarez and People v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am
Ltd ([2008] 1 AC 1), and on the judgment of Lord Neuberger MR in Imerman v Tchenguiz ([2010] EWCA Civ 908). [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Last month, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled in Camara v. [read post]
