Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2008, 10:39 pm
The California Supreme Court noted, however, that “no reported California state court decision [had] endorsed the Ninth Circuit’s [narrow restraint] reasoning and we are of the view that California courts `have been clear in their expression that section 16600 represents a strong public policy of the state which should not be diluted by judicial fiat’. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 4:43 pm
Indeed, given the Boisson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:44 am
Benson, and the same as the ruling in KSR v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 5:43 pm
United v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am
Milward v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 3:29 pm
" United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 8:18 am
(O’Donnell v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 5:25 am
The appellate court agreed Keith wasn't entitled to a refund since "[t]here is a strong public policy in this state ... against restitution or recoupment of the overpayment of child support. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 10:33 am
Berbig v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm
Dunn v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 12:00 pm
Kevin Walsh at the University of Richmond argues that because of previous Supreme Court precedents, subject matter jurisdiction doesn't exist and that the case, Virginia v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 1:01 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:09 am
LSUC and Alberta (Education) v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
It also looks quite strong in implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose cases. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:24 am
In Hitachi High Technologies America, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:32 pm
A: I am a strong proponent of shorter opinions. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 1:29 pm
” United States v. [read post]
