Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer" Results 2561 - 2580 of 2,743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
As a result, constitutional arguments against the mandate quickly moved from “off the wall” to “on the wall,” and, by the conclusion of the oral arguments at the Supreme Court in March 2012, many observers expected that the individual mandate would be held unconstitutional. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:05 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
So common, in fact, that 4 out of the 5 Hearing Officers in Livonia will generally accept the Evaluator's (the Clinician who performs the required Substance Abuse Evaluation) analysis of the condition, and how it relates to the person's alcohol problem diagnosis, as long as the analysis contained therein seems thorough enough, and supported by factual observations. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
(BLOG@IP::JUR) CAFC Judge Rader: ‘Stronger IP system allows countries to compete in world marketplace’ (PatentlyBIOtech) Professor Mossoff’s historical paper about patent thickets, patent trolls and patent pools: relevant today (IP Dragon) The balance between standards and patent regulation (IP Frontline) Patents in a bear market (IP Solutions)   Australia Full Federal Court: Commonsense approach to trade mark use and the beer/wine dichotomy… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:26 pm by PaulKostro
Kelly, 97 N.J. 178, 187 (1984), the Supreme Court, in the context of a claim of BWS self-defense to the killing of the batterer, held for the first time that a battering relationship embodies psychological and societal features that are not well understood by lay observers. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm by Harley Geiger
Supreme Court declared long ago that individuals have no “expectation of privacy” in public places, making people on city streets or open fields fair game for aerial surveillance. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:53 pm by Harley Geiger
Supreme Court declared long ago that individuals have no “expectation of privacy” in public places, making people on city streets or open fields fair game for aerial surveillance. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Consider, for instance, a professor discussing the arguments in the Supreme Court's affirmative action cases. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 4:30 am by Gene Quinn
  The Supreme Court has taken Microsoft’s appeal in the i4i case presumably to strike a blow to the presumption of validity a patent enjoys. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by SHG
  Just Jose's word against the cop's. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:51 am by Lovechilde
By Simon Chesterman, originally posted at American Constitution Society's blog, June 9, 2011. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:41 am by Frank Pasquale
Maybe it's because, while colleagues of mine were trying to nip the housing crisis in the bud, a phalanx of deregulators on the Supreme Court came up with a politicized preemption decision that let the good times roll for America's most predatory banks? [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
  However, in a concurring opinion, two of the judges suggested that the Federal Circuit should reevaluate its standard for imposing enhanced damages in light of the Supreme Courts recent decision in Octane Fitness LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 1:07 pm by Steven Calabresi
Samuel Johnson's 1755 Dictionary of the English Language defines a Duty as a "Tax; impost; custom; [or] toll. [read post]