Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 13,833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2020, 9:49 pm
Case date: 24 July 2020 Case number: No. 20-15014 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
Way back in 1983, in Bearden v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 11:46 am
Following Yang, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit also issued a decision in Securities & Exchange Comm’n v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 6:52 pm
The United States District Court for the Central District of California, denied motion for intervention as of right and for permissive intervention, and Reynier appealed. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:45 am
In Rafferty v. [read post]
Voter Advocacy Orgs Sue Trump Administration for Executive Order Threatening Social Media Censorship
27 Aug 2020, 9:12 am
In the lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California today, the plaintiffs argue that the executive order is designed to chill social media companies from moderating the president’s content in a way that he doesn’t like—particularly correcting his false statements about elections. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 9:30 am
Boilerplate language has been held insufficient in California and other states—a good example being Watson Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 6:17 pm
Meanwhile, there’s an additional directive from the government: invoking his authority under the statutory framework for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), President Trump separately ordered TikTok’s parent company ByteDance to divest itself of TikTok within 90 days (with the possibility of a one-month extension). [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are no cases pending at the California Supreme Court at this time. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
In Boerne v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
” (Cite to Dart v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:12 am
On Monday afternoon, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held an Epic Games v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
" Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 6:42 pm
For example, Amazon argued that it did not set the price for third-party products and therefore cannot “spread the cost of defects across units sold. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 1:39 pm
(California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, August 8, 2020, Archer v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
After the Supreme Court decided Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:44 pm
Following Yang, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit also issued a decision in Securities & Exchange Comm’n v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:28 am
Defense Distributed's efforts were initially met with opposition from the United States Department of State. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
It would effectively “go around” encryption by allowing the interdiction of malicious materials in an unencrypted state, even in the absence of predication for law enforcement intervention. [read post]