Search for: "United States v. Holder" Results 2561 - 2580 of 4,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
” At the birth of the United States, copyright was couched in terms of property more often that not. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 7:50 am by Seth A. Katz
On November 9, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States agreed to hear another case relating to class actions in arbitration proceedings. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am by Terry Hart
It was primarily raised by the United States, acting as amicus curiae. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
A different district court followed suit and stated that Section 106 should be read literally to create an independent, exclusive right “to authorize” use of a copyrighted work.14 That court held that “mere authorization . . . constitutes direct infringement and is actionable under United States Copyright Law. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 8:04 am by Ronald Mann
Moments after Joshua Rosenkranz (arguing for Kirtsaeng) started to present his argument, Justice Ginsburg stopped him to express her concern that the regime he proposed (“universal exhaustion,” as she termed it) would have the United States giving more limited rights to copyright owners than any other country in the world. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 12:10 am by Administrator
In other words, the case deals with the fate of all copies that the U.S. copyright owner made, or licensed to be made, and which happened to have been made anywhere other than in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:12 pm by David Kemp
In the case, Supap Kirtsaeng, a college student from Thailand studying in the United States, launched a small online business selling textbooks. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:12 pm by David Kemp
In the case, Supap Kirtsaeng, a college student from Thailand studying in the United States, launched a small online business selling textbooks. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-5271, for yesterday’s grant in McQuiggin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
§ 1609 provides that ““the property in the United States of a foreign state shall be immune from attachment arrest and execution. [read post]