Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 10,389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm
Tillett retained the right to use the KROMA mark in the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm
Strawbridge punts the question and suggests that the court follow the model of United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 4:25 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
UtiliCorp United Inc., 497 U. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 12:24 pm
Firebird Restaurant Group, LLC et al – United States District Court – Northern District of Texas – August 21st, 2019) involves of a claim of trademark infringement. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:57 pm
Case date: 07 August 2019 Case number:No. 18-10157 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:04 am
In the example of a 50 year old teacher who would have worked until the age of 65, who earning $60,000/year, a Court can quantify the past and future income loss for the family unit. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:01 am
The United States Supreme Court recently handed down a decision that directly addresses this concern. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:36 pm
A trademark owner can save time, expense, and effort by adopting an inherently distinctive mark and ensuring it is registered on the Principal Register with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 7:07 am
., a Houston-based restaurant group, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 8:43 am
Consent Order vs Exclusion Order: At the ITC, Swagway had proposed a consent order that it “would not sell for importation, import, or sell after importation into the United States products sold under the SWAGWAY mark. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Herrick v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
As is customary in such battles in the United States, those who have sought to impose their orthodoxy on the rest of us have veered from one extreme to another. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:18 pm
United States, even as it belatedly repudiated that awful precedent. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:33 am
Blockchain Luxembourg S.A. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:27 am
Corp. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 8:31 am
In some states capital charges are available in some circumstances. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:17 am
Case date: 01 August 2019 Case number: No. 18-1477 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
