Search for: "United States v. Scott"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 2,831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Many are reported to be seeking asylum.[1] They have active proceedings to determine their status and, pending such determination, are authorized to remain in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
The discovery obligations with respect to statistician expert witnesses vary considerably among state and federal courts. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
In response to the debate the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Gareth Johnson) told the House that these matters would be dealt with in legislation which, he said, was being drafted. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm
Congrats Scott! [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:25 am
United Property & Casualty / United Insurance Holdings Corp: $10 million in dividends each year, including $4 million in dividends to CEO United Property and Casualty, the main operating subsidiary of United Insuran [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:44 pm
Professor Hany Farid is a computer science professor at Dartmouth College in the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
In the face of continuing uncertainties in the United States and abroad, we expect the provisions of transaction agreements that allocate regulatory risk to remain an area of focus. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Some states require the plaintiff to provide a specific trade secret disclosure document before discovery commences. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
Some states require the plaintiff to provide a specific trade secret disclosure document before discovery commences. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:38 am
The judge assigned to Division H is The Honorable Scott A. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:34 pm
I turn to guidance from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 9:16 am
On March 6, Dred Scott v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Massachusetts’s highest court based its decision on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:26 pm
That can’t be the law of the United States. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:10 am
The claim about "more mature content for more serious gaming" is something that with my games industry background (once the first person to work for Blizzard outside the United States) and my own experience playing games I have to reject: it's just not true that mature content implies or fosters serious gaming. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 7:50 am
The rot has been growing for some time, and has now reached the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 1:35 pm
For international misappropriation, consider whether you want to pursue relief in the foreign jurisdiction or in the United States. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:26 pm
But few condemn United States v. [read post]
