Search for: "United States v. Stevens" Results 2561 - 2580 of 4,056
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 12:24 pm by admin
Now, in a thoughtful and unanimous opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:28 am by constitutional lawblogger
Without much fanfare, President Obama signed into law the Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010, intended to cure the defects of the previous law, held unconstitutional last April in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:17 am by Andrew Koppelman
Calabresi, “A Government of Limited and Enumerated Powers”: In Defense of United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:22 pm by houndedcowed
As noted a few posts down, a prior ban was struck as unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:01 pm
 But first I should say that en route to that conclusion, Judge Hudson did get something important right: He rejected the federal government's argument that because the Act was challenged on its face, it had to be upheld unless, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:00 am by James Bickford
On Friday, the President signed a law to replace the statute struck down by the Court as overbroad in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:38 am by David Oscar Markus
No more crush videos: President Barack Obama on Thursday signed into law a bill that outlaws the creation and distribution of so-called animal crush videos -- culminating a remarkably quick response to a Supreme Court decision handed down less than eight months ago.It was April 20 when the Court, in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm by Lawrence Solum
If we assume that utility functions yield values expressed in units of utility or utiles, then individual's utility function might score possible world P at 80 utiles and possible world Q at 120 utiles. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 11:29 am by Kent Scheidegger
  They know it when they see it.For the fate of Congress's previous attempt, see United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:29 pm by Heidi Meinzer
Stevens, in which the United States Supreme Court struck down Congress’s previous effort to criminalize animal crush videos. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:17 am by Michael M. O'Hear
Interestingly, the Krieger court went out of its way to criticize the current state of the jurisprudence, echoing Justice Stevens’ concurring opinion last May in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:08 pm by Raj Chohan
  In the biggest work place class action ever, the United States Supreme Court has granted cert on the question of whether plaintiffs can use the Rule 23(b)(2) injunctive class procedure as a vehicle to seek money damages. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:49 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 Sometimes there is nothing wrong with letting the United States Supreme Court decide whether a decision is correct and, if not, whether it is worthy of correction. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 12:38 pm by Steve Hall
This is a federal death penalty case, so any request for clemency -- a commutation of the death sentence to a life sentence -- would be directed to the President of the United States. [read post]