Search for: "V D"
Results 2561 - 2580
of 76,325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2008, 9:20 am
Regina (Thames Water Utilities Ltd) v Bromley Magistrates' Court (Water Services Regulation Authority intervening) [2008] EWHC 1763 (QB); [2008] WLR (D) 264 “Sewage escaping from pipes maintained by a statutory undertaker was "controlled waste" within the meaning of s 33 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:34 am
Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd v Abbey National Treasury Services plc (Financial Services Authority intervening) [2008] EWHC 1897 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 277 “The Financial Services Authority had power under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to include rules in the financial services compensation scheme which provided for the assignment of third party claims. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:12 am
Regina (Hope and Glory Public House Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court (Westminster City Council intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 31; [2011] WLR (D) 20 “Although an appeal to a magistrates’ court from the decision of a local authority’s licensing committee was a full rehearing on all the evidence the committee’s decision was a relevant matter to be taken into consideration and should only be reversed if the judge was satisfied that the original… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:07 am
R (One Search Direct Holdings Ltd (trading as One Search Direct)) v York City Council [2010] EWHC 590 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 87 “In failing to provide access to unrefined information, the council was not acting in a way that was contrary to the Government’s intention not to impose an obligation on authorities to allow such access, nor to the aims and purposes of the statutory provisions, including the subsidiary legislation made by the Secretary of State. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 6:07 am
Thomas (renamed Capitol v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:49 pm
Because Count V is not precluded from coverage, the D&O insurer had a duty under the policy to defend WoodSpring. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:13 pm
Dept. of Health and Human Services (D. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 7:11 am
In Stillwater Mining Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:34 am
Per Wallace v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 5:33 am
Per Wallace v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Introduction On 8 June 2016 the Supreme Court heard the appeal in Bailey & v Angove’s PTY Ltd [2016] UKSC 47, in which it was asked to consider the effect which terminating an agency has on the authority of the agent to collect debts owed to the principal. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:23 am
NS v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Amnesty International Ltd and others intervening); ME and others v Refugee Applications Comr and another (Amnesty International Ltd and others intervening); (Joined Cases C-411/10 and C-493/10); [2011] WLR (D) 388 “European Union law precluded the application of a conclusive presumption that the member state responsible for examining an asylum claim pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No… [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:47 pm
Dist: Kratovil (D) v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:50 am
§ 343.307(1)(d), we conclude that the phrase 'with an excess or specified range of alcohol concentration' modifies the phrase 'using a [...] [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:59 pm
Telephone Call Processing Patent Claims Found Invalid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:56 am
Civil litigation — Notice of appeal — Timeliness This appeal derives from an Order issued by the Circuit Court for Dorchester County that, inter alia, granted Summary Judgment to appellee, Laurance Casler. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:22 am
Real property — Easement — Right of way Appellee, Antoinette Wilson, purchased a parcel of waterfront property in Coltons Point, Maryland, in February 2002 and recorded her deed shortly thereafter. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:14 pm
By Michael Borella -- In October 2017, Hyper Search brought a patent infringement action against Facebook in the District of Delaware, asserting U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 7:14 am
Key Insight: Plaintiff filed a motion to compel after learning through the discovery process that defendants purged or lost emails and documents. [read post]
