Search for: "A,B,C Insurance Companies"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2015, 6:24 pm
My clients are shocked to learn that (a) people actually drive cars with no insurance - as in 0 insurance; (b) they were hit and injured by someone with a basic policy of only $25,000.00 of coverage (the minimum in Illinois at this time); and/or (c) the other person's insurance was just "rescinded" for fraud or misrepresentation in taking out the policy (aka - again - no insurance!). [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:21 am
As those involved in D&O Insurance claims well know, a recurring D&O insurance problem is the question of whether or not the D&O insurer for a bankrupt company can pay the costs of the bankrupt company’s former directors and officers incurred in defending claims against them. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 8:35 am
[1] This includes (a) a company (first company) which belongs to the captive insurer’s “group of companies” (as defined under the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622)); (b) a company (second company) in which either the captive insurer itself or the first company holds or is entitled to exercise the control of, at least 20% but not more than 50% of the voting power at the general meeting of… [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:47 pm
– Being informed that your insurance company will not pay a dime. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 2:18 pm
Symetra Life Insurance Company B- Metropolitan Life Insurance Comapny Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston C+ American General Life Insurance Company American International Life Assurance Company of New York The Prudential Insurance Company of America [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 8:15 am
Further, the statement must comply with Section 551.002(b) and (c), and the rules required under 551.002(d). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
The company "guarantees" aren't insurance and shouldn't be treated as such. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 10:13 am
During this time, Granger and Steigerwald were insured by Owners Insurance Company and Auto-Owners Insurance Company, the Appellants. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 11:48 am
The type of commercial property insurance held by each policyholder; b. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:13 pm
(a) the agent misrepresents the nature, extent or scope of the coverage being offered or provided . . . , (b) there is a request or inquiry by the insured for a particular type or extent of coverage . . . , or (c) the agent assumes an additional duty by either express agreement or by ? [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:36 pm
In today’s case the Plaintiff company leased a BMW. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:21 am
§ 14501(c)(1)) trumps all other state and federal rules authorizing liability of motor carriers, brokers, and freight forwarders. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:42 am
So we have to refocus the insurance company. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:22 pm
State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, a 1933, Austin Court of Appeals case. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:52 pm
The traditional D&O insurance policies have three insuring agreements, denominated Side A, Side B, and Side C. [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:51 pm
Counsel responded that plaintiffs served the special administrator, who tendered the complaint to the insurance company, who they appeared in the case. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:33 am
It is excess Side A coverage above the company’s traditional D&O tower (which itself has Side A coverage, Side B Company Reimbursement Coverage, and Side C Corporate Entity coverage imbedded therein). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:47 pm
(b) Serious impairment to bodily functions. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:04 am
As a result, the court held that: (a) the first policy period expired on July 1, 2004 – and the attorney letter should therefore have been tendered within 30 days of that date; (b) the lawsuit and the letter were the same “claim” for purposes of determining insurance coverage; and (c) the time to report the claim under the policy had therefore expired before the lawsuit had even been filed. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 5:34 pm
” The Court provided the following analysis: a) The agreement contained no express language that the sole purpose of the insurance was to secure support; b) The releases in the agreement made clear that the agreement constituted a full and final settlement of all issue, which precluded a finding that the insurance was intended solely as security, as such a finding would lead to further litigation; c) There was no “draw down” clause whereby Mr. [read post]
