Search for: "A & E Entertainment Inc"
Results 241 - 260
of 949
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2012, 3:03 am
Southern Illinois Miners, LLC, Opposition Nos. 91183196 and 91183698 [Sections 2(d) and 43(c) oppositions to MINERS and SOUTHERN ILLINOIS MINERS & Design for professional baseball entertainment services and ancillary goods, in light of the registered marks MINERS and several mining-related designs for collegiate athletic entertainment services and ancillary goods].August 8, 2012 - 2 PM: Syndicat Des Proprietaires Viticulteurs De Chateauneuf-Du-Pape v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 6:54 am
As you may recall, in late June 2021, the Judge James E. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 3:33 pm
Express Lien Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
Caymus Medical, Inc., 107 USPQ2d 1519 (TTAB 2013) [precedential]. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
Immediately thereafter, David’s company, Hologram USA, Inc., and others filed suit for patent infringement against Pulse in the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 5:01 am
Rose is a director of Darden Restaurants, Inc., and Gaylord Entertainment Company. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:12 am
The Panel in Umpqua Investments, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:59 pm
Black Horse Carriers, Inc. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:59 pm
Black Horse Carriers, Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:50 am
/FL Mgmt., Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
” The Federal Circuit cited its 2009 Aycock Eng’g Inc. v Airflite, Inc. ruling, which explained the use requirement for a service mark. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 12:25 am
Milacron Inc.)Order Granting Motion to Convert Case to Chapter 7Movie Gallery, Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
See In re E. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 11:56 am
E*Poly Star, Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 11:00 pm
Santana's Grill, Inc., Cancellations Nos. 92043152, 92043160, and 92043175 [An intra-family dispute concerning three registrations for marks containing the word SANTANA'S for restaurant services.]February 5, 2009 - 2 PM: In re Gratnell's Limited, Serial No. 78450327 [Refusal to register the product configuration mark shown below for storage trays, on the grounds of functionality under Section 2(e)(5), or alternatively on the grounds of lack of acquired… [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 8:07 am
Schofield Excavation, Inc.[1] decision. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:50 am
Under former Trademark Rule 2.120(e)(1), a motion to compel had to be filed prior to the commencement of the first testimony period. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 8:07 am
Schofield Excavation, Inc.[1] decision. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:55 am
"And so the Board affirmed the genericness refusal, as well as the alternative mere descriptiveness refusal under Section 2(e)(1).Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
