Search for: "A. B. A. v. Wood"
Results 241 - 260
of 895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
At this blog, Scott Dodson previews arguments in Wood v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
In the recent case of Accord Healthcare v Medac Gesellschaft [2016] EWHC 24 (Pat), Birss J noted that if an invention is not obvious over concrete prior art, the Court is entitled to be sceptical that it is nevertheless obvious over the CGK alone (see paras 119-124).Jamie Muir Wood reviewed the recent decision in Unwired Planet v Huawei [2016] EWHC 576 (Pat) (the third technical trial, which involved a standard essential patent), where an… [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am
, Texas Monthly, March 2013 Miscellany • Stephen B. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:03 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
US, No. 06-11612 Express consent by counsel suffices to permit a magistrate judge to preside over jury selection in a felony trial, pursuant to the authorization in the Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. section 636(b)(3). [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:45 pm
Wood v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:44 am
(b) DEVELOPEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF GUIDANCE AND PROCEDURES.- (1) IN GENERAL. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
Cox Enterprise, Inc. d/b/a The Atlanta Journal Constitution, et al., 2011 Ga. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Bullard v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Woods (Paulette) v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:08 am
Thomas B. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am
Herrera nor Indian law more broadly are out of the woods yet. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
Criminal law: Impaired drivingR. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
No. 109–14, at 42 (2005)); see also Woods v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) was heard on 8 February 2012 and judgment was reserved. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 11:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
Finally, the organization explains that even if a cumulative cap did not apply, Culbertson would still need to refund to his client, Katrina Wood, the EAJA fee and collect from Wood herself the portion of the Section 406(b) fee that combined with the Section 406(a) fee exceeds 25 percent of Wood’s past-due benefits. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 9:44 am
While recently clearing a layer of wood-pulp debris from my office ("Don't toss that! [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:58 am
[Behrend v. [read post]
