Search for: "ACE LTD"
Results 241 - 260
of 768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2008, 3:45 pm
Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley [2008] EWCA Civ 1162 In March 1987 Mr Foley became the tenant of a property owned by the predecessor in title of the Board. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 32What happens to a lease for an uncertain term? [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd (Rev 1) [2011] UKSC 32What happens to a lease for an uncertain term? [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 10:00 pm
Although the precise circumstances of the instant applications appeared not to have previously arisen, in analogous circumstances where a conviction was based on the law as it was understood to be, a subsequent change in the law would not be a valid ground for leave to appeal out of time unless substantial injustice had been done: R v Benjafield (Karl Robert) (Confiscation Order) (2002) UKHL 2, (2003) 1 AC 1099. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
S Franses Ltd v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Ltd, heard 17 Oct 2018. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:55 pm
The proposed tort bears close comparison to the UK’s misuse of private information action, developed from Campbell v MGN ([2004] AC 457). [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am
R (Newhaven Port and Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council & ANor [2015] UKSC 7 R (Newhaven Port and Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council & Anor [2015] UKSC 7 concerned an area of land, known as West Beach, along the East Sussex foreshore within the operational land of Newhaven Harbour, which has existed since the mid-sixteenth century. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:36 am
The IPKat thought he knew all there was worth knowing about what would be classified as being of a "generally elliptical cone shape", when he read the judgment of Mr Justice Patten in Ancon Ltd v ACS Stainless Steel Fixings Ltd back in October 2008 (IPKat commentary here). [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:34 am
Further, four members of the House of Lords in OBG Ltd v Allen had emphasized the need to confine the tort within careful limits. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 7:54 am
There is no formal definition of works of artistic craftsmanship, but the published guidance has produced suggestions (pg 7) as to how the courts will approach this type of work based on the cases of Hensher (George) Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd[1975] RPC 31, HL and Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another [2012] 1 AC 208:• It is not enough for a work (such as a piece of furniture) to look attractive to qualify as a work of artistic… [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:12 am
Pye (Oxford) Ltd and J.A. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Or, as per Robert Walker J in Stockholm Finance Ltd v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:32 pm
On 4 March 2019, the decision in Venables & Anor v News Group Papers Ltd & Ors ([2019] EWHC 494 (Fam)) was handed down. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
Or, as per Robert Walker J in Stockholm Finance Ltd v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 1:05 pm
Under the tenancy agreement, the landlord was said to be Wealth Harbour Consulting Ltd. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Ltd., 840 F.2d 1572, 1010, 6 USPQ2d 1001, 1010 (Fed. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:23 pm
The shortlisted teams, in alphabetical order, are: Indiana Corridor Transportation Group (joint venture of ACS Infrastructure Development, Inc. and Fengate Capital Management Ltd.), partnering with Dragados USA, Inc., F.H. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 11:20 am
"Likely" means more likely than not, according to the House of Lords in Cream Holdings v Bannerjee [2004] UKHL 44, [2005] 1 AC 253, although this ordinary meaning might have to be applied flexibly sometimes.The claimant argued that s. 12(3) did not apply, relying on the carve-out in Article 10(2) which allows freedom of expression to be curtailed to protect the rights of others - here, the claimant's proprietary rights in its confidential information. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 11:20 am
"Likely" means more likely than not, according to the House of Lords in Cream Holdings v Bannerjee [2004] UKHL 44, [2005] 1 AC 253, although this ordinary meaning might have to be applied flexibly sometimes.The claimant argued that s. 12(3) did not apply, relying on the carve-out in Article 10(2) which allows freedom of expression to be curtailed to protect the rights of others - here, the claimant's proprietary rights in its confidential information. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 2:04 am
Not only that, there were breaches of contract both by the defendants and induced by them, the elements of the tort of inducing a breach of contract (knowledge, intention and damage, as laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1) being made out against most of the defendants. [read post]
