Search for: "ARMSTRONG v. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 627
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Despite the majority's holding to the contrary, I believe this case must be controlled by our decision in Armstrong v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 8:30 am
” The lecture, presented by the Indian Legal Program (ILP) at the College of Law at Arizona State University, is scheduled to begin at 4:30 p.m. in the Great Hall of Armstrong Hall on the Tempe campus. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:23 am
The following is a brief case description: Armstrong v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
” State v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:25 am
AsIs v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:35 pm
” R.C. 4123.01(C)(1) In 2013 the Supreme Court considered the case of Armstrong v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:26 pm
In order to find that GPS devices require a search warrant the Court had to distinguish the use of GPS devices from the use of beepers in the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 6:58 am
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:02 pm
Armstrong, 479 So. 2d 1164 (Ala. 1985), by the state’s highest court, the Alabama Supreme Court, governed. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:56 am
The Court did not hold in Armstrong v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 3:21 pm
In People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:12 am
The state is alleging the defendant knowingly permitted witnesses to commit perjury at a criminal trial. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 11:38 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:45 pm
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong had an excellent explanation of lis pendens: Federal courts look to state law regarding in matters pertaining to lis pendens. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Chandler v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:41 pm
As I pointed out in a prior post the 1983 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:14 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:21 pm
In light of the US Supreme Court’s decision this week not to grant review in Iskanian v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 5:08 pm
Justice Armstrong was satisfied that Mr. [read post]
