Search for: "Abbott v. United States" Results 241 - 260 of 925
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:05 am by Joel R. Brandes
Sometime between August 31, 2018 and September 3, 2018, Mother moved with Son V to the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
Today’s live blog team comprises Emma Boffey, Rory Thomson, Shona McCusker, Sian McNiff, Kenneth Rose, Emma Cross, Will Anderson, Mitchell Abbott, Felicity Bramall and Jennifer Love, all from CMS. 16:01: Lady Hale thanks the parties for the swiftness of their submissions and notes that the Court will adjourn until 10.30am tomorrow. 16:00: Lord Keen QC rests his submissions. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:35 pm by William W. Abbott
  First, the fee included the estimated cost of lands which were given to the City by the United States Navy. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The Tenth Circuit has not yet ruled on whether such a First Amendment right of access exists in civil cases, see United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 5:30 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am by Eugene Volokh
“The right to public access ‘serves to promote trustworthiness of the judicial process, to curb judicial abuses, and to provide the public with a more complete understanding of the judicial system, including a better perception of its fairness.'” United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am by Eugene Volokh
"The right to public access 'serves to promote trustworthiness of the judicial process, to curb judicial abuses, and to provide the public with a more complete understanding of the judicial system, including a better perception of its fairness.'" United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 11:00 pm
The underlying suit was based on Abbott's belief that the defendants were importing, advertising, and subsequently distributing boxes of Abbott's international test strips in the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:36 pm by David Kopel
The first post-Heller case to examine an age limit for the Second Amendment was the First Circuit's United States v. [read post]