Search for: "Abrams v State" Results 241 - 260 of 472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2014, 7:22 pm by Joy Waltemath
Citing management comments that an African-American detective “did not fit in” with an elite group of troopers and a white officer would “fit in better” as sufficient to raise an inference of pretext as to the real reason why he wasn’t assigned to that specialized unit, the Second Circuit vacated summary judgment that had been granted to the public employer (Abrams v Department of Public Safety, State of Connecticut). [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:46 am by Kevin Smith
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated an award of summary judgment for the defendants in Abrams v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:09 am by Joy Waltemath
The lower court’s grant of summary judgment and a jury verdict in favor of his employer on his retaliation claims were affirmed, however (Abrams v Department of Public Safety, State of Connecticut, July 14, 2014, Wesley, R). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am by pscamp01
 The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am by pscamp01
 The first article in the issue is titled “Plessy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:42 am by Amy Howe
The second group of witnesses were law professor Jamin Raskin, legendary First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams, and North Carolina state senator Floyd McKissick, Jr. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 5:46 am
Phelps), and false claims to possess the Medal of Honor (United States v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:41 am by Broc Romanek
Justice Carolyn Berger’s 14-page opinion in ATP Tour Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:47 am by Joy Waltemath
The judge refused to allow the former employee to file a second amended complaint and also declined to exercise jurisdiction over the former employee’s state law claims (Segarra v Federal Reserve Bank of New York, April 23, 2014, Abrams). [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:28 am by Howard Wasserman
Happersett, Plessy, Abrams, Buck v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:43 am
Judge Abrams wrote that this “argument is unpersuasive because it conflicts with the Second Circuit’s holding in Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]