Search for: "Absentee Ballots Case"
Results 241 - 260
of 640
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2020, 1:41 pm
In the case of Harley v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 10:56 am
A federal judge on Sunday upheld Minnesota’s extended absentee ballot deadline. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 9:40 am
” This case is currently on appeal before the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:54 am
” Further, it noted that “absentee ballots have become one of the hot-button issues of the 2020 election. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 1:59 pm
Ohioans have four ways to cast a ballot in this (currently underway) Presidential election: (1) vote in person on election day, (2) vote in person at some point in the four weeks leading up to election day, (3) mail in an absentee ballot; or (4) drop off an absentee ballot at a drop box. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 1:55 pm
These provisions altered the witness requirements for absentee voters, the deadline for the receipt of absentee ballots, and whether individuals other than voters may deliver absentee ballots. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:31 pm
In more COVID- and election-related news, two-thirds of an Eleventh Circuit panel stays a district-court order directing Georgia to accept absentee ballots that are both postmarked by and received within three days after Election Day. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:39 am
The court further opined: Voters have had many months since March to register or obtain absentee ballots; reading the Constitution to extend deadlines near the election is difficult to justify when the voters have had a long time to cast ballots while preserving social distancing. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Ballot Measure 2 would mandate more transparency about who is funding the super PAC-like independent spending groups that operate in Alaska’s elections. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:59 am
Indiana’s absentee voting system allows for individuals over 65 to request an absentee ballot by mail. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 6:49 am
In the recent presidential debate, he stated, “As far as the ballots are concerned, it's a disaster...a solicited ballot is OK but an unsolicited ballot is not...It's a rigged election. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:45 pm
“The Supreme Court Warned Against Changing Voting Rules Near Election Day And Then Did It Anyway; The justices reinstated South Carolina’s requirement that absentee voters have a witness sign their ballot; Sen. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision, the Supreme Court reinstated South Carolina’s witness requirements for absentee ballots today, reports Zoe Tillman of Buzzfeed News. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:38 am
And on Monday night, in an emergency order, the court reinstated a South Carolina requirement for voters to sign absentee-ballot envelopes in the presence of a witness. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 6:50 am
The relevant portion of the directive stated that, “[t]o ensure uniformity and to provide voters with consistent guidance on the absentee ballot application process, County Auditors shall distribute only the blank Official State of Iowa Absentee Ballot Request Form. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:46 pm
The post Justices reinstate witness requirements for South Carolina absentee ballots appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:44 am
The court decided to halt the rules over concerns for those who have already cast a ballot in North Carolina: By September 22, 2020, over 150,000 North Carolina voters—including plaintiffs Heath and Whitley in this case, and plaintiff Wise in Wise—had cast absentee ballots under the statutory scheme and the August2020-19 memo. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:15 am
Democratic National Committee, a case involving “wrong precinct” voting and the ballot collection practice referred to as “ballot harvesting. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 8:01 am
With early and absentee voting looming larger than ever, it would be likely that the party would have no way to change the name on the ballot. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 5:20 pm
“GOP lawmakers, federal judges ask state Supreme Court to weigh in on ballot case”: Patrick Marley of The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has an article that begins, “A panel of federal judges changed course Friday and asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to clarify one of its rulings as the federal judges decide how to handle absentee ballots this fall. [read post]
