Search for: "Ace v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,872
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
In this post, Richard Bamforth and Jessica Foley, who work within the litigation and arbitration group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court last month in the matter of Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd) [2020] UKSC 48, which concerns when an arbitrator should disclose circumstances which may give rise to justifiable doubts as to her or his impartiality. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 10:42 am
Mariner Health and Ace USA, 994 So.2d 1051 (Fla.2008). [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
, (European Journal of International Law, Forthcoming).Kristin Henrard, State Obligations to Counter Islamophobia: Comparing Fault Lines in the International Supervisory Practice of the HRC/ICCPR, the ECtHR and the AC/FCNM, (Erasmus Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2020). [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
As to the wisdom of the Defence, in both its common law and statutory incarnations; this is what Lord Hobhouse said in his speech in Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127 to the then House of Lords; “The liberty to communicate (and receive) information has a similar place in a free society but it is important always to remember that it is the communication of information not misinformation which is the subject of this liberty. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:27 pm
The legislative purpose is to prevent persons who, having become intentionally homeless, would by obtaining temporary accommodation obtain priority in the provision of housing to which they are not entitled (see per Lord Reed in Haile v Waltham Forest London Borough Council [2015] AC 1471 at paragraphs 61 and 22). [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm
As stated I am also concerned for her emotional wellbeing. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The first is Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd). [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
That case places in question two of the most important decisions on the law of limitation of recent times: Deutsche Morgan Grenfell Group Plc v Inland Revenue Comrs [2006] UKHL 49 (“Deutsche Morgan Grenfell”) and Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council [1999] 2 AC 349 (“Kleinwort Benson”). [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 6:47 am
” (Campagnolla v Mulholland, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990].) [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm
(v) conducting, on the agency’s behalf, collective bargaining negotiations under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 12:30 pm
(v) conducting, on the agency’s behalf, collective bargaining negotiations under chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The Divisional Court considered the construction of each policy wording and the FCA, the Appellant Insurers and the Hiscox Interveners appeal on a number of points On Monday 16 November, the Supreme Court will also hear the appeal of Robinson (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:59 pm
United States 20-518Issue: Whether Michigan v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:24 pm
Fourth, "in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:11 pm
The decision arose on an application to stay or dismiss the enforcement proceeding at the jurisdictional stage. [2] Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804. [3] The judge noted that the House of Lords had rejected the argument that it should not recognize the courts of the German Democratic Republic (Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853), and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals was not… [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 9:39 am
” False Claims Act cases are prosecuted by the DOJ Civil Division in Washington, D.C. and by “Affirmative Civil Enforcement” (ACE) Coordinators appointed in each of the 94 U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application… [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 3:00 pm
GlaxoSmithKline v. [read post]
