Search for: "Adam Feldman"
Results 241 - 260
of 813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2019, 6:31 am
Others who have looked at the data, such as Adam Feldman of Empirical SCOTUS, reach the same results. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:36 pm
Early coverage comes from Adam Liptak of The New York Times; Robert Barnes of The Washington Post; David Savage of The Los Angeles Times; Lawrence Hurley of Reuters; Jessica Gresko of the AP; Greg Stohr of Bloomberg; Ariance de Vogue and Veronica Stracqualursi of CNN; and Antonia Blumberg and Marina Fang of HuffPost, Fang wrote separately about Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 12:34 pm
“261 Days to Gundy”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 3:57 am
’” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman observes that “with 55 cases already decided, we have unique and surprising patterns of decision-making among the justices,” most notably in “the Court’s 5-4 (or 5-3) decisions, where one vote could shift a decision in a different direction. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 8:23 am
“A Wild Ride of a Term with Twenty Decisions Still to Go”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman “examines various modes of … participation [by the Office of the Solicitor General] in the Supreme Court at the cert stage for a subset of cases from the OSG under Obama and the OSG under Trump. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 5:22 pm
“Comparing Cert Stage OSG Efforts Under Obama and Trump”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 5:32 pm
“Where We Stand at the Beginning of June”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:29 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes the justices’ voting patterns so far this term, which “reinforce the proposition that Kavanaugh and Gorsuch have not been in consistent agreement,” noting that “if they continue at this rate they will vote together the least frequently of any two justices in their first terms together appointed by the same president going back to President Kennedy. [read post]
22 May 2019, 5:30 pm
“So Happy Together”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:12 am
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that although “[a]bortion rights are at risk at the Supreme Court, … the short-term threat may not come from extreme laws like the one passed by Alabama lawmakers” this week: “The court led by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:42 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes the interaction among justices and between justices and attorneys during this term’s oral arguments. [read post]
6 May 2019, 2:38 pm
“Competition to Speak During 2018 Supreme Court Oral Arguments”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 2:30 pm
* Adam Feldman poses -- and answers -- an interesting question: are particular justices more or less partial to certain lawyers' or law firms' positions? [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines “the role of lawyers in Supreme Court decision making. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 10:34 am
“Advocates that Drive the Justices’ Votes”: Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 2:30 pm
Adam Feldman evaluates the evidence thus far. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:33 am
Key Findings The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) requires a subset of taxpayers to compute their income tax liability twice—once under the ordinary individual income tax, and again under the AMT that allows fewer tax preferences—and pay whichever tax is highest. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s “first set of votes on the Supreme Court” to determine whether they “present a picture that may (1) differentiate him from some of the other conservative justices and (2) help us understand where exactly he fits in the Court’s ideological spectrum. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
” Adam Feldman has this post at his “Empirical SCOTUS” blog. [read post]
