Search for: "Adoption of Cox" Results 241 - 260 of 525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm by Peter Jacobs
Representative Christopher Cox (R-Calif.) claims in a Richmond Journal of Law and Technology blog post. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 11:59 am by Bradley Coxe
Coxe is a practicing attorney in Wilmington, NC with Hodges & Coxe PC who specializes in Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, Homeowner's Associations, Contract and Real Estate disputes and all forms of Civil Litigation. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 5:35 pm
The new year likely will bring a wave of governance and regulatory reforms that go beyond those adopted in 2002 in response to the accounting scandals at Enron and WorldCom. [read post]
6 May 2022, 3:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
A State may adopt safeguards necessary and appropriate to assure that the administration of justice at all stages is free from outside control and influence. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  To the extent that a particular jurisdiction that previously permitted a heeding presumption with reference to Restatement §402A, comment j has subsequently adopted the Third Restatement, it can be argued that the heeding presumption has been/should be abolished.AlabamaThere is no heeding presumption in Alabama. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
Of course, to terminate parental rights via adoption, there must be an adoptive parent available (usually a step-parent). [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Cox involved a bunch of other challenges to the anti-SLAPP statute, which the court did not address. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 6:51 am by Allan Blutstein
Judge Friedrich instead adopted the kind of functional inquiry endorsed by Judge Sentelle in his mediocre concurrence—one that conditions the “commercial” quality of the contractors’ names on the context of the records at issue. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:56 pm by Zachary Spilman
In a 3-2 decision, Judge Stucky, joined by Judge Ryan and Senior Judge Cox, rejects the appellant’s claim that California law regarding his capacity to contract is controlling, and the court adopts the position articulated by the government at oral argument that the constructive enlistment provisions of Article 2(c) apply to this case. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:51 am by Todd Hendrickson
(Because wrongful death claims did not exist at the time the Missouri Constitution was adopted, the caps applicable to such cases were deemed valid.) [read post]