Search for: "Afford-A-Care, Inc." Results 241 - 260 of 1,918
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2020, 3:23 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 29 conference) Smith & Nephew Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 4:01 am by Greg Lambert
That you know, and the issue is that people just can’t afford the high cost of justice, you know, and that’s a big obstacle in the legal system. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 7:58 am by Daily Record Staff
Berman co-founded MZQ Consulting in 2014, which has helped employers implement the Affordable Care Act (ACA). [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Because it would not be a conflict-of-interest transaction, the revised recap would qualify for the protections afforded by the business judgment rule. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 11:46 am by Robert Liles
  More than 14,000 treatment and aftercare facilities current treat more than 3.7 million individuals in the United States.[2]  With the expansion of insurance eligibility under the Affordable Care Act,[3] the number of individuals who covered by health insurance has continued to grow over the last decade. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:50 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
En el caso Burwell contra Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., el Tribunal Supremo de Estados Unidos sostuvo que el mandato anticonceptivo suponía una carga sustancial para el libre ejercicio de las empresas estrechamente vinculadas con organizaciones religiosas. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:29 am by Priscilla Smith
Pennsylvania is a real kicker, and not just because it upholds a regulation that undermines the “contraception coverage” provision of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:31 am by Amanda L. Tyler
§1252(e)(2) and afforded additional procedural opportunities to seek asylum in the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:47 am by Dennis Crouch
., Inc., 305 F.2d 916 (Cust. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:49 am by Grant Sullivan
Adhering closely to the distinction drawn in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
See Care & Protection of Edith, 421 Mass. at 705, 659 N.E.2d 1174 (“An injunction that forbids speech activities is a classic example of a prior restraint”). [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:25 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The Court’s decision in Bostock was consolidated with two other cases, Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]