Search for: "Amendments to Florida Probate Rules"
Results 241 - 260
of 443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 7:59 am
Now, in the latest decision in a very long-running Florida probate litigation, Aronson v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 6:51 am
These statutes are notoriously complex and difficult to decipher (as I recently noted here in connection with amendments to F.S. 733.817, Florida’s equivalent apportionment statute). [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:11 am
The state of Florida told the Supreme Court that the state ruling conflicts with Supreme Court precedent that a dog sniff is not a search under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:18 pm
Taylor, 338 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2003) (upholding a Florida probation condition that referenced areas “where children frequently congregate”). [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:18 pm
Taylor, 338 F.3d 1280 (11th Cir. 2003) (upholding a Florida probation condition that referenced areas “where children frequently congregate”). [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 2:13 pm
4th DCA Jun 25, 2008) Although the 4th DCA reversed the probate judge's ruling in this case, it did recognize that there's a glitch in the statute governing the payment of examining committees. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:34 am
So (perhaps not surprisingly), the probate judge in this case ruled in favor of the familiar: the revocable trust. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:58 am
Ruling on remand from a 3rd Circuit decision of July 9, which had vacated his prior order in the case, Judge Katz found that the two men were family members and that the Probation Office should have exercised its discretion under the standard probation rules to allow them to resume contact. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:31 am
Florida (summarized here) and Brumfield v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:31 am
Florida (summarized here) and Brumfield v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
YES The probate court ruled the unsigned copy of the codicil generated from the drafting attorney's office computer did not qualify as a "correct copy" under F.S. 733.207 based on a 1980 Florida Supreme Court decision defining a "correct copy" as follows: The word “copy,” then, means a double of an original instrument, such as a carbon or photostatic copy. [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:39 pm
Florida (08-7412) and Sullivan v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:11 am
His Florida estate will be subject to Florida probate. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
Substitution of a party after the death of a party is governed by Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.260(a)(1). [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
” They say these spending limits violate the First Amendment. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:40 am
” Florida v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
A First Amendment violation? [read post]
