Search for: "American Federation v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGE."
Results 241 - 260
of 277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
If you visit Kevin's law office, he will show you the commemorative towel. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
If you visit Kevin's law office, he will show you the commemorative towel. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Attorney’s office says Robb Feedyard pleaded guilty to violating the Clean Water Act and agreed to pay the fines and penalties. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:23 pm
The Struthers Industries decision comes on the heels of EBSA’s success in Solis v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
Emmerich, Sabastian V. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
§ 233(a) make the Federal Tort Claims Act the exclusive remedy for claims arising from medical care and related functions provided by Public Health Service personnel, thus barring Bivens actions? [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Khuzami was followed by appointments of two other former federal prosecutors to senior positions: George Canellos, as Director of the New York Regional Office, and Lorin Reisner, as Deputy Director of the Enforcement Division. [read post]
21 May 2009, 3:55 am
Office of Personnel Management et al. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Apr. 3, 2009)Denial of state unemployment no bar to federal ADEA retaliation claim Carter v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:46 pm
The federal Office of Personnel Management sent a letter on February 20, according to a report this morning in The New York Times, advising the Administrative Office of the U.S. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 6:53 am
Golinski’s case, Judge Kozinski said that federal law authorized the Office of Personnel Management to arrange health benefits for federal employees and their family members. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
Among the named defendants are the federal Office of Personnel Management, the U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Rule 23(b) If they manage to satisfy all of the prerequisites of Rule 23(a), would-be class plaintiffs also must show that they satisfy at least one of the three 23(b) requirements. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:07 pm
See Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Federal Ins. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
An extensive complaint seeking federal prosecution of American officials who ordered, authorized, approved or committed war crimes is currently being prepared. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Moore Federal Appellate Court Decisions Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here1st Circuit Casamento v. [read post]
